Tag / Venture Capital

by

AlphaTakes – Series A Preferred Stock Term Sheet (part two)

In this second of a two part AlphaTakes video series, Matt Storms discusses the second half of the Series A Preferred Stock term sheet for an emerging technology company, using the Series A term sheet published by the National Venture Capital Association.

Here are the key takeaways from this video:

  1. The three most common alternatives to anti-dilution provisions:
    • Weighted average
    • Full ratchet
    • No anti-dilution provisions
  2. Several provisions are not typically heavily negotiated in Series A financings:
    • Pay to play requirements
    • Attorneys’ Fees
    • Registration rights
    • Participation rights
    • Drag-along rights
    • No shop requirements
  3. Keep an eye on the big picture
by

Capital Saving and Raising at the Brink

At the Capital Saving and Raising at the Brink event held as part of the 2011 Forward Technology Festival, the tech community collaborated on best capital saving ideas, discussed experiences related to capital raising, and gave short pitches on new ideas.

The Capital Saving and Raising at the Brink event held Monday, August 22, 2011 as part of the Forward Technology Festival was a success!  Entrepreneurs, investors, government representatives, and others interacted and shared ideas in a collaborative forum. 

Capital Saving

In the Capital Saving segment led by Troy Vosseller, attendees were divided into six teams, and each team collaborated to identify the ways in which they have saved capital in their businesses.  Teams simultaneously entered their ideas in different tabs of a GoogleDocs workbook.  Team captains pitched their team’s top two ideas, and attendees voted electronically on the top two ideas.  The winning ideas were: Continue reading →

by

Finders under Fire

Small businesses often have challenges with raising capital from investors. Recent government enforcement actions and commentary from regulatory agencies, however, emphasize some of the risks associated with working with unlicensed finders to raise equity capital.

Small businesses often have challenges with raising capital from investors.  Gaining access to equity capital can be difficult and complying with a myriad of rules and regulations when seeking help in raising funds can be very confusing.  When raising equity capital, many entrepreneurs seek assistance from unlicensed “finders” for introductions to potential investors. Recent government enforcement actions and commentary from regulatory agencies, however, emphasize some of the risks associated with working with unlicensed finders.

So . . . What do Finders Find?

Generally, finders make introductions between investors and companies, but do not actually sell securities or close transactions on behalf of the companies selling the securities.  If a finder is providing anything more than a simple introduction or access to contact information, or is receiving a fee based on the completion of a transaction, then the finder needs to be licensed as a broker-dealer. Continue reading →

by

Bridge Financing Documents

One of the sets of documents that we have automated at AlphaTech Counsel is the bridge financing documents for an emerging company. Attached is a sample of the documents.

One of the sets of documents that we automated at AlphaTech is the bridge financing documents for an emerging company.  Attached is a sample of the documents: Convertible Note and Subscription Agreement

Instead of just using form documents as most law firms do, robust automation allows us to deliver common document sets for emerging companies in a more efficient manner.  So what else does “robust automation” yield?  It improves document accuracy, provides a valuable knowledgebase from which to draw, and enables us to deliver common document sets to our clients quickly.  It also frees up time of our lawyers to enable them to spend less time on basic contract drafting and more time on activities that afford our clients higher value. Continue reading →

by

Paper Stock Certificates: A Thing of the Past?

As public companies are increasingly opting out of providing paper certificates to shareholders in favor of providing electronic registration, most private companies and their shareholders have yet to follow suit. Issuing uncertificated shares is allowed under most states’ laws, and, as many on the public company side can attest, numerous cost and time efficiencies can be gained by going paperless with shares.

As public companies are increasingly opting out of providing paper certificates to shareholders in favor of providing electronic registration (a movement known as “dematerialization”), most private companies and their shareholders have yet to follow suit.  Issuing uncertificated shares is allowed under most states’ laws, and, as many on the public company side can attest, numerous cost and time efficiencies can be gained by going paperless with shares.  As we accept electronic statements to represent our public company holdings and exhibits to Operating Agreements to note our LLC ownership interests, do we really still need as evidence of our private company ownership a hokey, bordered piece of paper with an eagle on it?

Disadvantages of Issuing Paper Stock Certificates

Consider the inefficiency and chances for errors in the typical cumbersome process to issue paper stock certificates:  Continue reading →

by

LLC Choice of Entity for Emerging Technology Companies

The recent $1 Billion Qualifying Therapeutic Discovery Project Credit program should be a real boon to many area companies. A surprise to many though when reading the fine print of the program is that limited liability companies that have a tax-exempt organization as an owner, as many university biotech spinoffs do, are not eligible for a grant under the program. While there is a cumbersome fix for this, the “LLC issue” for emerging companies extends well beyond this grant program, however.

The recent $1 Billion Qualifying Therapeutic Discovery Project Credit program will be a real benefit to many area small life science and medical device companies. A surprise to many though when reading the requirements of the program is that limited liability companies (LLCs) that have as an owner a tax-exempt organization are not eligible for a grant under the program. Having a tax-exempt organization as an owner is more common than one might think. Many university technology transfer offices, such as the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF), are tax-exempt organizations and frequently hold an equity interest in the startups to which they license patents. As a result, those LLC biotech licensees are not eligible for a grant under the program. As the CEO of an LLC with which I work (but did not set up) said earlier this week about being excluded from eligibility, “Ouch! That stings! Another painful learning experience.”

LLCs are Typically Not the Best Choice of Entity for Emerging Technology Companies

The “LLC issue” for emerging companies extends well beyond this grant issue for therapeutic companies. I say this even though many attorneys recommend LLCs for virtually all contexts. Sure, LLCs have their place. I frequently advocate using them as holding companies, investment vehicles, and joint venture entities. Among other situations, it also can be appropriate to use them when there is a limited, small group of owners actively participating in the business or when the owners want to have a certain allocation of profits and losses that cannot be accomplished when using an S or C corporation. But for many emerging companies that have or plan to have outside investors, the LLC is often not the best choice of entity. Continue reading →

by

Term Sheets for Angel and Venture Capital Investments

When raising funds from angel investors or venture capital firms (VCs), the offering terms are often summarized in a term sheet prior to consummating the deal. This post covers the basics of angel and VC term sheets.

When raising funds from angel investors or venture capital firms (VCs), the offering terms are often summarized in a term sheet prior to consummating the deal.  Term sheets negotiated with angel investors are typically less complex than those proposed by VCs, but there can be considerable overlap between the two.

Negotiating with Angel Investors

When dealing with angel investors, it is typical for the company to produce the initial draft of the term sheet.  There are variations by region and it is not uncommon to see an angel investor or angel group prepare the initial draft of the term sheet, especially if the company has not already prepared one.  If an angel investor or angel group has taken on the role of lead investor, it is common to see the term sheet negotiated. In such cases when a term sheet has been negotiated, it is important that the company communicate that fact with subsequent prospective investors to avoid further negotiations and different terms.

Elements of an Angel Investment Term Sheet

In an equity financing with angel investors, the terms of the deal are often rather straightforward.  Typically, the security being offered is either common stock or a stripped down preferred stock. The angel investor term sheet will typically contain at least the following:

  • A description of the security being sold
  • The price for the security
  • The company pre-money valuation
  • The minimum (if any) and maximum amount to be raised
  • Basic information about the issuer (e.g., whether it is a corporation or limited liability company, the state of incorporation/organization)
  • The current capitalization table
  • Any applicable security transfer restrictions

The term sheet may also contain other provisions that address issues such as board representation, veto rights over certain types of transactions or conduct, co-sale or tag-along rights, drag-along rights, dividends, put rights, piggyback registration rights, and anti-dilution provisions.

Once the term sheet is “finalized” for the equity financing with angel investors, it often becomes an important element of the issuing company’s private placement memorandum, if one is used.

Negotiating with VCs

When dealing with VCs, in almost every case, it is the VC who prepares the initial draft of the term sheet. Unless the deal is very small, VCs commonly invest in small groups or syndicates (e.g., two or three firms), with one VC acting as the lead. The lead VC will typically present the term sheet, and the company will have a relatively short time period to accept it or negotiate its terms (in an attempt to prevent the company from “shopping” the deal).

Elements of a Venture Capital Term Sheet

Venture Capital term sheets are usually complex. Below is a list of issues that are often included or addressed in a VC term sheet. This list is in addition to the items listed above for an angel investment term sheet.

  • Conditions to closing the investment
  • Closing date
  • Identity of investors.
  • Dividends (the percentage and whether cumulatve or not)
  • Liquidation preference (e.g., amount (multiple) and whether the security is participating preferred stock or not)
  • Board representation (e.g., single board member or control of the board)
  • Protective provisions (veto rights over certain types of transactions or conduct)
  • Conversion rights
  • Anti-dilution provisions (weighted average or full ratchet)
  • Pay-to-play provisions (assuming more than one VC is participating)
  • Redemption/put rights (requiring the company to buy back the investors’ shares on a given date)
  • VC’s attorneys’ fees (shifting costs over to the company)
  • Demand registration, S-3 registration, and piggyback registration rights
  • Management and information rights
  • Participation or preemptive rights
  • Employee stock or equity incentive requirements and limitations
  • Tag-along (co-sale) and drag-along rights
  • Confidentiality and no shop requirements

There can be a variety of other provisions and requirements included, such as a tranche or milestone funding process.

Upon acceptance of the term sheet, the VC’s attorney steps into the process (if he or she had not already done so at the initial due diligence stage). The VC’s attorney typically produces the initial drafts of the investment documents.

Term Sheet Forms

There are many good resources on the Internet with sample venture capital term sheets. Likely the best known is the one published by the National Venture Capital Association (NVCA). The NVCA form term sheet contains many good explanations of the various provisions in a VC term sheet. However, as you might have guessed with the authors of the form (VCs and their lawyers), the NVCA term sheet is generally drafted in favor of the VCs.

A version of the NVCA term sheet form that contains more company-friendly terms and more detailed discussions of the various negotiating points was prepared by those of us on the American Bar Association (ABA) Private Equity and Venture Capital  Committee. The ABA Comments to the NVCA term sheet form is intended to do the following:

  • Generate more options and alternative provisions, including many that are more company-friendly
  • Provide more detailed explanations concerning key provisions and negotiating points
  • Elaborate on current case law and the implications of various provisions
  • Identify which of the alternative provisions are more frequently used

Using resources such as the NVCA term sheet and the ABA Comments can help prepare companies to negotiate effectively (and more efficiently) with angels and VCs.